Stan,

I have similar feelings.  I never did fill flash with the built in
flash so the AF360FGZ has been doing about the same duty for fill
flash.  But, like you, if Pentax had not made the MZ-S, I would still
be quite happy with the PZ-1p.


Bruce



Saturday, May 25, 2002, 7:43:34 PM, you wrote:

SH> Two things I miss, having moved from
SH> PZ-1p to MZ-S:
SH> 1. Dial-in fill flash with the built in and/or external flash;
SH> 2. Off-set rather than centered flash hot shoe.

SH> I also found the PZ-1p a bit easier to program wrt bracketing shots.

SH> The MZ-S is faster, quieter, and a bit more comfortable in my hands. And it
SH> has the data-imprint on the film.

SH> If the MZ-S had not been produced, I would still be comfortable with my
SH> PZ-1p. But once I held the MZ-S I could not resist.

SH>  Stan

>> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 19:29:29 -0700
>> To: Ken Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re[2]: What is the most quiet body?
>> 
>> Ken,
>> 
>> I'm curious.  Having owned both the PZ-1p and the MZ-S what, other
>> than the mentioned 4.3 FPS, does the PZ-1p do that the MZ-S doesn't.
>> 
>> 
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Friday, May 24, 2002, 7:24:56 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>> KA> Elenor,
>> KA> I sold some stock today and I guess I will take a couple thousand and
>> KA> finally invest in a good AF camera and one or two lens.  I have about
>> KA> decided to get a PZ-1p for the 4fps advance and the 1/250 flash sync.
>> KA> It just seems to have some things that I want that the MZ-S doesn't
>> KA> have. I have also been looking at the Pentax Smcp-fa 80-200 2.8 Ed and
>> KA> its $1300 price tag at Adorama.  Its either that or the 200/2.8 and the
>> KA> 300/4.5 for about the same price.
>> 
>> KA> What can you tell me about your PZ-1 that you think I should know?
>> 
>> KA> Ken
>> 
>> KA> On Wednesday 24 April 2002 05:59 pm, you wrote:
>>>> Out of PZ-1, LX and ZX-5n, I reach for the ZX-5n when I want a quiet
>>>> SLR. Even though it has a motor, I think it sounds less obtrusive
>>>> than the others.
>>>> 
>>>> Haven't had the opportunity to compare the sound of the ZX-5n to an
>>>> ME Super or MX (yet) -- although I'd like to.
>> -
>> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
>> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
SH> -
SH> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
SH> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
SH> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to