"better tracking?"
Does that infer a more tenacious
focus lock on?
J
Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> It's a bit frustrating to read some of the answers.
> 
> E.g. I am not sure how the last answer addresses the last question:
> "How would you compare the performance of hand-held pixel shift II with pixel 
> shift on a tripod?
> 
> Pixel shift on a tripod is more effective in getting higher definition, low 
> noise, and false-color-free images than Dynamic Pixel Shift."
> 
> 
> I might be overly critical, but to me corporate-speak like "We will 
> continuously improve the quality of the product anyway." is an empty 
> statement. Does it mean that their engineers are working overtime to figure 
> out the problem? (I doubt.) Or, do they make sure that Drunken Joe
> has no more than 5 drinks before his shift?
> 
> I agree with Paul that the information about focus tracking improvements
> is interesting. At least I haven't heard it before.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Igor
> 
> 
> Gonz Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:16:43 -0800 wrote:
> 
> Not much substance here, lots of sandbagging...  Leaves you wondering...
> 
> https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/cpplus-2018/cp-2018-pentax-interview.html
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to