"better tracking?" Does that infer a more tenacious focus lock on? J Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Igor PDML-StR <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's a bit frustrating to read some of the answers. > > E.g. I am not sure how the last answer addresses the last question: > "How would you compare the performance of hand-held pixel shift II with pixel > shift on a tripod? > > Pixel shift on a tripod is more effective in getting higher definition, low > noise, and false-color-free images than Dynamic Pixel Shift." > > > I might be overly critical, but to me corporate-speak like "We will > continuously improve the quality of the product anyway." is an empty > statement. Does it mean that their engineers are working overtime to figure > out the problem? (I doubt.) Or, do they make sure that Drunken Joe > has no more than 5 drinks before his shift? > > I agree with Paul that the information about focus tracking improvements > is interesting. At least I haven't heard it before. > > Cheers, > > Igor > > > Gonz Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:16:43 -0800 wrote: > > Not much substance here, lots of sandbagging... Leaves you wondering... > > https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/cpplus-2018/cp-2018-pentax-interview.html > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
