Exactly. And maintaining focus in continuous mode. A boon for us bird
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "better tracking?"
> Does that infer a more tenacious
> focus lock on?
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote:
>> It's a bit frustrating to read some of the answers.
>> E.g. I am not sure how the last answer addresses the last question:
>> "How would you compare the performance of hand-held pixel shift II with
>> pixel shift on a tripod?
>> Pixel shift on a tripod is more effective in getting higher definition, low
>> noise, and false-color-free images than Dynamic Pixel Shift."
>> I might be overly critical, but to me corporate-speak like "We will
>> continuously improve the quality of the product anyway." is an empty
>> statement. Does it mean that their engineers are working overtime to figure
>> out the problem? (I doubt.) Or, do they make sure that Drunken Joe
>> has no more than 5 drinks before his shift?
>> I agree with Paul that the information about focus tracking improvements
>> is interesting. At least I haven't heard it before.
>> Gonz Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:16:43 -0800 wrote:
>> Not much substance here, lots of sandbagging... Leaves you wondering...
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow