It claims that the very act of obsessing about photographing instead of
experiencing will diminish the memory of the visited place.
My thought when I read the article was that people more obsessed by
collecting crutches for their memories than trusting their ability to
experience have been around for much longer than phone cameras.
Jostein
Den 30.03.2018 04:27, skrev ann sanfedele:
The photos , indeed, didn't seem have much to do with the article at
all.. I'm guessing she wrote the (overly-long & boring) article, handed
it in and someone decided to add some photos to it.
ann
On 3/29/2018 9:00 PM, John wrote:
On 3/29/2018 09:44, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
While reading the article, I looked at the photos (while struggling
to find their relevance), so, I don't remember what the article said.
;-)
Igor
Daniel J. Matyola Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:08:46 -0700 wrote:
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/3/28/17054848/smartphones-photos-memory-research-psychology-attention
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I'm not sure I get the point of her article. She seems to be saying
memories are better than photographs, but her first example is a "car
crash" where I think photographs would be way better than faulty
memories.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
