Mishka wrote:

Paul,
What I realized I had sorely missed was a color conversion filter, 
something like 80A. It was still sorta OK since I scanned the pictures 
afterwards and had a chance
to fiddle quite a bit in Photoshop, but still, I really wish I had either 
the filter or tungsten film. Of course, I am assuming you are shooting 
color, right?

Mishka,
I shoot only daylight-balanced color print film, and  I neither own nor use 
color correcting filters. Ace Photo in Sterling, VA does an outstanding job 
at color correcting; "Forget filters; leave the color correcting to me," 
advises Mo.") I need the speed (ISO 1600) of daylight-balanced film. In any 
event, theater lighting is such an odd and unpredictable mixture, I'm not 
sure that tungsten film would be in my interest. For a classroom setting, 
it could...though I more commonly see fluorescent lighting.

I like to tweak the digital scan in PhotoImpact anyway, cropping, enhancing 
or reducing contrast, and perhaps sharpening just a tad. In my digital 
touchups, I used to reduce saturation by 30 percent or more in an effort to 
make the people and their costumes look natural. But I'm coming to realize 
that recipients like their images a bit on the warm side; it reminds them 
of the theater milieu.


Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to