Aaron... I'm not sure about NPZ, but I photographed a play recently with
Fuji Superia Xtra 800 at 1600 and push-processed 1 stop. The proofs were
done by a good printer and the results were awesome (that's not just my
assessment). The color and contrast were good and the grain nearly
invisible. Is there something about NPZ that won't handle the extra stop
during development, or is this a comment about push-processing in general?

(Sorry I don't have any examples to share; I've got to get a better source
for scanning my pix.)

t 

On 5/29/02 6:17 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, at 06:21  PM, Paul F. Stregevsky wrote:
> 
>> I'll be shooting Fuji NPZ 800 at 1600 and pushed 1 stop.
> 
> Don't do it!  If you need to shoot it at 1600, shoot it at 1600, but
> process it normally, the images will be MUCH better.  If you're shooting
> multiple rolls, and don't believe me ( ;) ), start by processing two
> rolls, one normal and one "pushed".  From there, decide what to do.  It
> is very unlikely that you'll be choosing the "pushed" unless your lab is
> underprocessing to begin with.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to