The 1.4 DA converter plus D FA 150-450 is a great combo. Nearly as sharp as the lens alone. It vignettes a bit on full frame, but that’s rarely a problem, Paul
> On Jul 22, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ummm...I doubt it. I find the 500 > impressive, but might be fun to > compare. > J > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 22, 2018, at 5:12 AM, Alan C <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> *Jack Davis* jdavisf8 at comcast.net >> <mailto:pdml%40pdml.net?Subject=Re%3A%20PESO%20x%202%3A%20Martial%20Eagle&In-Reply-To=%3CECC16123-2A8A-46AE-9800-4F9DC93EA3AC%40comcast.net%3E> >> /Sun Jul 22 06:10:12 EDT 2018/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Nice Eagle catch and background! >> J >> >> Thanks, Jack. The Eagle was really a bit too far away in subdued light. (The >> Ellies were in bright sun). >> I sat there for about 20 min. waiting for it to move off but it really took >> its time eating. >> >> At 500mm I've tried the 1.7x AF TC on the Sigma at home. Softens the images. >> Obviously not as good as the newer 1.4x optically. >> >> Mind you, youv'e given me an idea: Perhaps 300mm + TC will be sharper than >> 500mm without? >> >> Alan C >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
