Bill, I take it that these were all in-camera multiple exposures, yes?
-----Original Message----- >From: ann sanfedele <[email protected] >Subject: Re: Peso: Two more from Wilson Creek > >Of the 4 you've shown us so far, 20186 is my favorite... it's nice to >accomplish capturing the smooth milky water as a blur, it isn't what one >can see >when you are actually in that place.. The texture of the water in the >this one takes me there.. it looks like what my eyes can see - nice >geometry too. > >ann > >On 9/15/2018 8:54 PM, Bill wrote: >> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson/wilson20184.html >> >> K1, A* 85/1.4 @ f5.6 18 exposure stack at 15 sec/exposure. >> >> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson/wilson20186.html >> >> K1, D FA* 50/1.4 @ f5.6 20 exposure stack at 1/6 second per exposure. >> >> My goal with these pictures was to try, to a certain extent, to >> emulate what I used to be able to do so easily with 4x5 film, which >> was get really deep depth of field along with tremendous detail, while >> at the same time introducing sufficient blur into the moving water to >> turn it to milk. >> >> To get this result, I needed to shoot at the best aperture and then >> stack the images, and use multi stop neutral density filters to expand >> the exposures out. I decided to throw the polarizer on mostly to see >> what it would do. >> >> This was the sort of thing I would have done with Ilford Pan-F rated >> at ISO 12 or so, and using an f/stop of 45 or even 64. >> >> Overall I am pleased with the result. >> >> Oh and, comments welcome. >> >> Thanks >> >> bill >> > >-- >ann sanfedele photography >https://annsan.smugmug.com >https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff >https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
