On 9/16/2018 5:07 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Of the 4 you've shown us so far, 20186 is my favorite... it's nice to
accomplish capturing the smooth milky water as a blur, it isn't what one
can see
when you are actually in that place.. The texture of the water in the
this one takes me there.. it looks like what my eyes can see - nice
geometry too.
Hi Ann, thanks for that. That one was kind of accidental, it wasn't what
I was setting out to shoot, but it worked out favorably. I noticed with
the very long exposures that I was losing all the definition in the
submerged rocks, so I tried a couple at shorter exposures. All I did for
that one was take off the ND filter and adjust the time appropriately.
bill
ann
On 9/15/2018 8:54 PM, Bill wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson/wilson20184.html
K1, A* 85/1.4 @ f5.6 18 exposure stack at 15 sec/exposure.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/wilson/wilson20186.html
K1, D FA* 50/1.4 @ f5.6 20 exposure stack at 1/6 second per exposure.
My goal with these pictures was to try, to a certain extent, to
emulate what I used to be able to do so easily with 4x5 film, which
was get really deep depth of field along with tremendous detail, while
at the same time introducing sufficient blur into the moving water to
turn it to milk.
To get this result, I needed to shoot at the best aperture and then
stack the images, and use multi stop neutral density filters to expand
the exposures out. I decided to throw the polarizer on mostly to see
what it would do.
This was the sort of thing I would have done with Ilford Pan-F rated
at ISO 12 or so, and using an f/stop of 45 or even 64.
Overall I am pleased with the result.
Oh and, comments welcome.
Thanks
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
