But is it really "machine art"? Or is it "Art" made by people using machines?
Ultimately the tool you choose doesn't matter as much as your skill using those
tools and how well you you are able to show others what you've "seen" with your
mind's eye.
If you can communicate your vision, then it's the appropriate tool.
On 10/23/2018 10:33, P. J. Alling wrote:
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no longer
recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art not
photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produced by humans not by
machines mainly because machine art is kinda dull.
On 10/23/2018 10:10 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
