On 2 Jun 2002 at 23:27, William Robb wrote: > Chris, I am not going to rehash everything that Mafud has said > about small format digital capture. > I am only going to say that now that I have actually had the > opportunity to work with the results, I have to agree with him. > > And yes, it pains me to say that.
Hi Bill, I can understand your disappointment however I'll just say don't base your whole digital camera perspective on the experience gained from as you said is a "bloated point and shoot, with a 3mp chip and a zoom lens". The G1 camera falls relatively early in the digital development curve, technology has progressed since, and as I've said before the number of pixels ain't the worst of the problems with this style of camera. Borrow the manual next time (if there is one) and tone down the in-camera image processing. My digital camera is now about a generation and a half behind its current peers but it's a still more capable than most of current the PnS style digital cameras. I just snapped an image in my back yard, evil conditions but here goes: http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/P6030661.JPG (2,643,842B) Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
