Because it's still the most accurate...and it doesn't have 36 million
built-in variables. ;-)
-p
On 3/12/2020 11:49 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On March 12, 2020 9:12:31 AM PDT, John <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/11/2020 09:32:03, Dale H. Cook wrote:
On 3/11/2020 5:54 AM, Alan C wrote:
Everything you say is probably quite true but I find it is easy
enough to do
any corrections at the PP stage so I don't get too carried away with
the
technicalities.
PP cannot correct clipping - once data is clipped it is gone.
It doesn't take a whole lot of fiddling to avoid that. Check the
histograms
occasionally to make sure nothing is climbing the walls at either end
and you
should be good to go.
If you need an exact exposure, use a hand held meter. Most of the time
it's not
critical.
I agree, most of the time it's not critical, but when it is, why carry around a
single meter when I have 36 million of them but into the camera?
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different" scares people.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
