On Fri., Dec. 4, 2020, 12:31 p.m. Ralf R Radermacher, <fotor...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 04.12.20 um 19:16 schrieb Rick Womer: > > > When the K-5 came out, I waited a year for the bugs to get squashed, and > then got one. > > Ah, the famous adhesive bubbles on the display problem. I had one from > the very first batch and eventually git to K-5 number 4 or 5 before the > trouble ended. Still, that was one fine camera only to be outdone by the > K-3 that I'm still using. > The K7 had the nicest flesh tone rendering of any digital camera I've used, but it didn't like being used off of base ISO. It got really noisy really quickly. I was doing most of my shooting in the studio, so I was good with it. I was an early adoptor of the K5 which was something of a mistake. My K5 pretty much sucked donkey balls. It was the worst camera I have ever used, and is the reason I ended up buying a couple of Fuji bodies and half a dozen lenses. I wanted a camera that worked. bill > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
