> On Dec 4, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri., Dec. 4, 2020, 12:31 p.m. Ralf R Radermacher, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am 04.12.20 um 19:16 schrieb Rick Womer: >> >>> When the K-5 came out, I waited a year for the bugs to get squashed, and >> then got one. >> >> Ah, the famous adhesive bubbles on the display problem. I had one from >> the very first batch and eventually git to K-5 number 4 or 5 before the >> trouble ended. Still, that was one fine camera only to be outdone by the >> K-3 that I'm still using. >> > > The K7 had the nicest flesh tone rendering of any digital camera I've used, > but it didn't like being used off of base ISO. It got really noisy really > quickly.
My K20 was fine at low ISO and sucked when pushed at all. Unfortunately, most of my photography at the time was in low light, and My K-x certainly rocked in that department. > I was doing most of my shooting in the studio, so I was good with it. > I was an early adoptor of the K5 which was something of a mistake. My K5 > pretty much sucked donkey balls. It was the worst camera I have ever used, > and is the reason I ended up buying a couple of Fuji bodies and half a > dozen lenses. > I wanted a camera that worked. Interesting, I’ve had great luck with K-5s. It was the first digital camera I had that pretty much covered my critical needs, though the K-3 and K-1 cover a bunch more of my serious wants. -- Larry Colen [email protected] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
