> On Oct 3, 2021, at 5:25 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > WTF?
The Interocitor is from “This Island Earth” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCMLmm8oLu4 And Lucas electronics have a someone iffy reputation. As in the 3-position light switch; off, dim and flicker. > > On 9/30/2021 19:01:53, mike wilson wrote: >> It would have been perfect, if only it had a.... >> https://youtu.be/MXW0bx_Ooq4 >>> On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not >>> the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear >>> suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body >>> unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of >>> the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original >>> production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. >>> It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the >>> E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States. >>> >>>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am >>>> aware of. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ken Waller >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: Re: GESO British car show >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro >>>>> was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development. >>>> Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates >>>> from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of >>>> development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that >>>> computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in >>>> engine and brake management. >>>> It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously >>>> debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t >>>> happen very often. >> -- >> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Larry Colen [email protected] -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
