Thank you Rob, Dan, Ann, Subash and everybody else for looking and
commenting!
(and to Subash for helping Ann finding the link in my lengthy message.)
Rob, to answer your question:
I used PS for stitching.
It was based on 13 individual shots (unless I skipped some
intermediate ones in the process - due to an excessive overlap).
I could save a tiff with 32765 on a side, but had to reduce the pixel
count to about 16000 for the largest jpeg (not shown here).
Now, I wonder if something like 64000x8000px could have worked
for the TIFF.
In any case, I have no need for those huge pixel numbers - as I am not
printing that pano... The question was purely "academic".
Thinking of which, - it could be cool to have a photo wall paper. :-)
I just need a large enough wall and wallet to cover...
:-)))
Thanks for sharing the pointer to Gigapan.
And your image there is great!
As an aside, the navigation and search there are broken.
E.g. searching for your name doesn't bring your profile or this photo.
And, I cannot get to your panorama from your profile page.
Cheers,
Igor
Rob Studdert Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:59:20 -0800 wrote:
Nice work Igor, what software did you use to stitch the images? I know
that LR, though quite capable and by far the best option to assemble
RAW image files, does currently have a maximum pixel dimension
(vertically or horizontally) of around 65000px and a maximum overall
size of 500Mpx total therefore limiting the max image size to around
64000x8000px.
I did see that original post re-hosting panoramic images but forgot to
reply. It is difficult to display them in a meaningful way on-line,
the most practical option I found was the Gigapan site. It's a little
long in the tooth, clunky and seems to be fairly niche these days but
it does still work, I put four images up about 5 years back and they
still appear to be accessible.
http://gigapan.com/gigapans/898e98242e191f917be68fcbf6230da4
Cheers,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
I've written this message almost 1.5 years ago, but never sent it...
I did this back in August of 2020, but than I was struggling with the
presentation of the panoramic photos (here is the thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg780894.html ), and I've never
followed up on that.
So, I am just presenting it as is, as a huge Jpeg file.
All comments are welcome!
Igor
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:39:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: [email protected]
Subject: PESO - PanESO - Grand Teton
Hi All,
Well, I've done it, - a panoramic photo that I don't know how to present.
This is the largest ever (pixel-wise) pano, as it was the first time I
couldn't save it as JPEG because of the pixel size limit for JPEG.
Somewhere online, I've found references that JPEG couldn't be larger than
some 65,xxx pixels in any direction. (It is probably less than 2^16-1=65536-1
= 65535, which is 2 bytes)
But that seems to be incorrect (or maybe it is an additional limitation
imposed by the software?). I couldn't save as JPEG even the image that was
less than 32765 px.
I was able to save as Jpeg only when I took that number down to about 16,000.
Grand Teton.
Warning: this is a 1MB file (600 px height):
https://42graphy.org/misc/2020-08-parks/pano_IR04802-14-2-600px-c.jpg
And if someone is interested, here is 1000px-tall (2.3MB):
https://42graphy.org/misc/2020-08-parks/pano_IR04802-14-2-1000px-c.jpg
All comments are welcome!
Igor
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
