Thanks Stan, Dan, Alan, and Ann.

> On Mar 28, 2022, at 5:40 AM, Stan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don’t have a flicker acct, couldn’t star/fave directly there… 
> I am always impressed by the technical expertise needed to get the star 
> shots, but the images themselves are usually not my favorite viewing. In this 
> 15-30 set, what really caught my eye was the next-to-last shot, the waterfall 
> (?)… Very nice!

Thank you, that is Thor’s Well just south of Yachats Oregon. Here are my other 
posted photos of it, some from an outlook several miles away so you can look 
down and see  it in context.  It’s definitely worth a stop.
https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=99496143%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&text=thor%20well&view_all=1

Do be careful, on one of my visits I got knocked over by a particularly large 
flood of water, both cameras went into the drink and my 15-30 stopped focusing. 
 I sent it to Precision, they said it had water damage and could not be 
repaired and didn’t charge me, but it was working just fine.  I think that 
banging the lens cap against the rocks might have just knocked a connector 
loose.

It’s a hole in the rocks that connects to a cave and at tides over about +4 
feet waves will push water up the hole, it will spout or flow onto the rocks 
and then flow back down the hole.  On one of my trips I had gone to Devil’s 
punch bowl about half a mile North of there, and within a month or two, two 
different friends posted photos of Thor’s well.  

    Larry

> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2022, at 1:28 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On facebook someone was asking about the 15-30. It turned out that I had 
>> already made an album of some photos I had taken with the 15-30 at night, 
>> and I added a few more stretching the definition of night to duskish.  It 
>> turns out that most of my reasons for the 15-30 are more about versatility 
>> (zoom, reasonably fast, reasonably wide, and weather sealing) rather than 
>> absolute technical ability.  It doesn’t matter how sharp the lens is if I 
>> can’t use it to take the photo I’m trying for.
>> 
>> I bought it when I bought my K-1, because to me the main technical advantage 
>> of the K-1 was faster lenses at wider angle of view than I could get with an 
>> APS body. I.e. there wasn’t a 10-20 that was f/2.8 or faster in APS. 
>> 
>> Aside from nerding out about the gear, I think I have gotten a few decent 
>> images with this lens.
>> 
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72157694628847712
>> --
>> Larry Colen
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 

--
Larry Colen
[email protected].   sent from ret4est




--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to