Paul, the same logic can be applied to slr/p&s comparison: interchangeable lenses become a money hole (of course they are!) the interchangeable screens and finders is a *huge* plus of LX. with finders you can do things like weird angle shots, etc. -- that would be a major PIA, if possible at all, with any other camera. and being able to change your screen is hardly a liability. in fact, the dirst thing i did when my MX arrived was putting a newer one, from LX, to get a much brighter view. think how much money people pay to get 1/2 stop faster lens to ease focusing -- here it would cost mere $30 or so.
although, you do make a very good point about having to try 'em all :) Mishka > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: k2 or kx or lx that is the question > Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 05:47:36 -0700 > > The problem with the LX is that you won't be satisfied until you've > tried out all the viewfinders. It becomes a money hole. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
