I feel like Sid does. Although the older bodies are fun, most of my shooting goes thru the LX or PZ-1p (or PZ-1 or Super Program). The reliability and extra features are just to easy to get adjusted to.
Furthermore, after years of shooting with the Super Program, I know exactly what to expect and how to compensate when shooting it or the PZ-1. The LX and PZ-1p still surprise me on occasion. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The K2s and DMD I have are toys, beautiful, expensive, finely crafted, > precision engineered, but they are my toys. The bulk of picture taking I > do for other people is invariably taken with the later models, in > particular, the PZ1 first, then the PZ 20, and the super program as the > third option. I just like to have better assurance of success, like > having TTL flash, mainly. Plus, these cameras are lighter, and plenty > enough robust for the "semi-pro" use I give them. In fact, the PZ1 has > survived several drops (one of them about 4 feet onto concrete-- > survived with only an abrasion to the corner) If I drop one of my k2s, > they'll invariable be a dent there, and the value of the camera for > resale has probably just dropped $100..... - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
