On 14 Aug 2002 at 9:57, Lindamood, Mark wrote: > Someone earlier got good advice on their trip to Greece. Okay, try this. > I'm going to the High Sierra camps in the backcountry of Yosemite, day hikes > between each camp, with side trips one or two days from base.... Use of that with >the primes will require fussy step-up rings, > while with the 24-90 and the 20 it will be plug and play. To me that seems the > decision maker, because I believe the 24-90 to be good enough to compete with > the primes, plus I like to crop with zoom. Any opinions, however, would be > welcomed.
Hi Mark, I'm late into this thread but in your case since you have to lug the gear about I'd suggest sticking with the 20 + 24-90, although there's not that much advantage in AOV with the 20 it might still make the difference and it's a damn sharp prime that is great in low light. Good luck. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
