I would say in general, the plastic of the (later) MZ bodies (at least) seems more durable than the Z1.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 August 2002 21:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MZ-S built quality (WAS: Re: > pentax-discuss-digest V1 #3040) > > > >..but the Z-1p's body is pretty cheaply made and it has nowhere near > >the > >rigidity of the MZ-S or its durability regarding the outer body. > > I think the top plate of the Z-1p is ok, but the bottom cover > should be made > of metal. Even the bottom plates of the MZ/ZX bodies > (excluding MZ-S) feels > stronger. > > regards, > Alan Chan > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To > unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the > directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery > at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
