I have a ZX-7, which is very similar to the ZX-L.  It's a great camera
and the improvemtns of the ZX-L can only make it better.  The fact that
Rebels outsell it by quite a bit is another tribute to the power of
advertizing and name recognition.

I have 4 lenses I use all the time:  Pentax 50 1.4, Pentax 100 2.8
macro, Sigma 24-70 3.5-5.6 and Sigma 100-300 4-5.6 (I may have the
aperatures a bit muddled on the zooms).  So there are good Pentaxes and
cheap Sigmas.  While I lean toward the former for "quality" shots, I
don't hesitate to use the sigmas, and some fo my favorite shots are made
with these tlenses.  I'll prbably replace them somday, but they were
cheap and well worth the small investment.  

It's like most things.  The last 10-20% improvement  in quality
requires a disproportionate investment.  If you shoot negs and don't buy
a loupe, you can be happy with a much wider range of lenses.  The
problem is that some folks are dirven crazy by others with this
attitude.

BTW, we have this inverted stage microscope (used for crystal analysis)
with some low power lenses (20-50x)  The offcial school photogrpher and
I have used it as a loupe, and, not surprisingly, it works amazingly
well.  You can tell differences between images using it, but I find that
this introduces a degree of "pickiness" that can easily lead  you to
obsession.  I acknowledge that some folks many have these needs (huge
enlargements, cropping, etc.), but you can come to think this way even
if you don't.  


Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/31/02 12:28AM >>>
Hi all,

I have a few small things to post about so I might as well bundle it
all 
together like a digest :)

Firstly, I loaded some film into my "new" LX today and did a few macro

shots.  What a fantastic camera.  Its very smooth and very responsive. 

It just doesn't get in the way.  But I will have to get used to that
DOF 
lever (the K2 and Z-1p both use a button).

When the LX's meter LED flashes, is this a "low battery" warning?  I 
changed the battery and it stopped happening.

I've also noticed that the meter LED glows brighter when you press the

shutter release halfway down.

Next thing on my mind is film.  I'm seriously considering completely 
switching over from E100SW to Provia 100F.  I spent a couple of hours 
mounting 6x7 slides last night, most of which were 100F.  When I came 
across an E100SW film I just did not like the warm colour rendition in

most shots.  Especially when I found that the first E100SW shot was 
identical to the last 100F shot (my films are in chronological order)
so 
I could compare the same scene side-by-side.

Last of all, I've decided that the quest for absolute sharpness in my 
slides is not as important as I used to think.  A good image will stand

out regardless of whether your lens was used wide-open, handheld at 
1/30th.  I've recently been looking through a couple of Galen Rowell 
books and found that while some of the images are a little soft, they
are 
still outstanding photographs.  So why lust after the greatest ultra-
sharp glass?  If I want more detail I'll shoot with a bigger format...

Cheers,


- Dave

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)


Reply via email to