epson 1250, but be aware that the film scans will have some scan lines.
--- TM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So what would be a recommended flatbed scanner to > produce somewhat > reasonable quality 35mm scans for about $150? If the > Canon is no good, > I need to find something else. > > HP? > > Epson? > > Microtek? > > Which model? > > Taka > > -----Original Message----- > From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Flatbed scanners for 35mm > > > Hi, > > TM wrote: > > > I recently got a Canon 1250U2F which has a 35mm > adapter > > and found that the scans are rather "soft" even at > 2400 > > dpi and they definitely don't appear acceptable > for printing, unlike > > the digital photos I've downloaded from my digital > camera, even at > > 2MP. > > I think this is a generic Canon fault. My Canoscan > film scanner is the > same, as are others I have seen. If (when) I > upgrade or it dies > permanently, I will not be buying another Canon. > > mike > > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
