Taka wrote:
> So what would be a recommended flatbed scanner to produce
> somewhat reasonable quality 35mm scans for about $150?

Hi Taka,

I'm actually satisfied with results from my Canoscan D660U, but I may not be
as critical as other users.  I paid about $120 or $130 for it about a year
(??) ago.  It has a lamp built into the hood for scanning 35mm negatives.  I
can get 2400 ppi scans out of it, giving full-frame files of about 22 MB.  I
think the single-pass optical resolution is actually 1200 ppi, and it
actually gets 2400 either by multiple passes using some sort of diffractive
optics, or else by software interpolation.  Often times I don't do any
sharpening during scanning or during post-scan processing, and I probably
~should~ do that as part of normal operating procedure.

Perhaps you can take a look at my PUG posts over the last year or so and see
how the results I get with this scanner compare with your needs?

Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY

Reply via email to