You know, you even put a smilie in and still someone misunderstands. At 11:09 AM 9/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>In a message dated 9/8/02 6:37:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ><< Seems the only logical choice you've ever made is choosing Pentax ;). > >At 04:58 PM 9/8/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >I started with a used Kodak rangefinder in the early 60's, moved up to a > >Nikkormat in 65 or 66. Switched to an OM-1 for the size and more reliable > >light meter. Switched to an ME-Super for the size and a more reliable light > >meter. Have stuck with Pentax for the last 20 years or so because of > >reliability, quality design, backward computability of lenses, and because I > >prefer Subarus over Explorers, Macs over Windoze machines, fountain pens > >over ball points, intuition over structured processes, and a harsh cabernet > >over a mellow merlot. So call me an odd ball. > > > >Stan > > >> > >Stan: Excellent choices. I also drive only Subarus. I also use only Macs >(although my daughter uses IBM and I often use it too). And, of course, use >only Pentax. >Bang for the Buck is what's all about.... >Vic
