HAR!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 September 2002 11:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MZ-S in PP/Thanx, Doug!
>
>
> > Has anyone seen the comparison in the August Practical Photography,
> between
> > the F100, EOS 3, and the MZ-S? Admittedly, these are all
> top-quality
> > cameras, but the reviewer appeared to deduct points because
> the MZ-S
> > has a mere 6 metering segments, although he had to admit that the
> > metering was very accurate. It's a pity so many people base their
> > judgement on specifications, rather than performance, which is what
> > actually counts.
>
> I think it was the mistake of Pentax. They should jam-pack
> the sensor with 20 or 30 fake segments but actually use 6
> segments only for metering. This way, nobody would doubt the
> quality of MZ-S's metering quality.
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
>
