Don't say cheapest say least expensive.
At 01:48 PM 9/18/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: MZ-S in PP/Thanx, Doug!
>
> > I think it was the mistake of Pentax. They should jam-pack the sensor with
> > 20 or 30 fake segments but actually use 6 segments only for metering. This
> > way, nobody would doubt the quality of MZ-S's metering quality.
>
>Actually the review was pretty favourable for the MZ-S. They praised the
>slanted top plate, well-thought controls set-up, magnesium housing, built-in
>flash, data impinting and "the ability to take virtually any Pentax K
>bayonet lens". They also noticed, that the camera is the cheapest of the
>three...
>The two other rivals - F100 and EOS 3 are IMHO tough ones and the latter won
>the whole test. However, "the margin of the victory is slight, since all
>three models have their good points".
>The Practical Photography is one of few magazines that notice Pentax
>products and show their strengths. Its editor, Will Cheung, constantly uses
>two cameras - EOS 3 and Pentax 645NII.
>Regards
>Artur
