> I wanted to know opinions on F 28mm 2.8 lens, and how it compares
> optically to A 28mm 2.8 Build quality is a joke (FA version is way
> better), but I want to know about optical quality.

I once had an A 28/2.8, and I found it to be somewhat soft (although
the build quality was reasonable).  I believe that the F 28/2.8 is
optically the same (but I can't speak for the build quality).  I
much prefer the K 28/2, the A 28/2, or the K 28/3.5.

> My FA 24mm has gone and I need a replacement.

Sorry to hear of your loss.  However, a 28mm lens is really not a
proper replacement for a 24mm lens.  Let's face it - once you've
used a 24mm lens, you're not going to be happy with a 28mm
"telephoto" (<g>) lens - you've got to have another 24mm lens or
even something w-i-d-e-r - <g>.

Fred


Reply via email to