At 07:55 AM 9/26/2002 -0400, Dan wrote: >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 02:21:02 -0500 >From: Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Pentax Digital SLR - a heretical viewpoint >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > >On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 10:03 PM, William Kane wrote: > > > My major problem with this idea is that making a SMALLER camera would > > hurt my hands. I already need to add a grip to my SLR's to make them > > fit comfortably, and sometimes it still hurts . . . Smaller is not > > necessarally better . . . however, if Pentax wanted to design one > > around this concept, perhaps they could just add more battery power? > > > >Or maybe they could add more slots for memory, like RAM slots in >'puters. That would take up more space and be almost as useful as more >batteries. > >Since we're talking improvements we'd like to see, how about� > >little plugin modules for digicams that tweak the look of the raw data?
Well unless you were replacing the firmware, and maybe the sensor with these modules I don't think that there would be any real difference between this and getting a plugin for your editing software. <SNIP> >Dan (the sleepy man) g'nite
