Heh...interesting. I am glad I have no reason to put pictures into a computer, even a cheap scanner and printer would be expensive! Never mind the big $$$ ones that produce a *decent* print. Hell, the only prints I get now are B/W, everything else is slide and I show it to no one but myself with a good loupe! I have enough crap on my walls now, nevermind adding 20x30 enlargements. Besides, if a 6-7 mp digital can make very good 11x14 prints, why go higher? You guys planning on using it as wallpaper? Velvia Rules!
Brad Dobo :) (Man did I jump around!) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax Discussion Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:23 PM Subject: RE: Why I am going digital, and have forsaken a Pentax DSLR > Here, here, Cotty! > > I love photography. I love taking pictures. With a DSLR, I could take > pictures all day everyday, and it would cost just pennies. A roll of Velvia > and the gas to get it developed works out to about $25.00 - $30.00 Cdn, then > I have to scan it in, correct all of the little digibits in it. It is a > long, expensive, and frustrating procedure when you know that a fully > digital workflow would cut the time by 80% and the costs by 95%. That is why > we are so mad at Pentax. > Cameron Hood, > An extremely disgruntled > Pentax user >
