Hi Glen, The only problem is, generally a group will pick one side. Look at mine for instance. I'll make up a number, say 100 threads with my case. Did I write 100? No. I wrote 50 one in response to another PDMLers email. These others that some speak of 'Not caring' are the very same people that perpetuate the thread. Am I to blame? Yes, but so are the other 50 people or so that responded to me. I think we all know why moderated lists exist eh? :)
Regards, Brad Dobo > > I have stayed completely quiet on this until now. But I feel compelled to > > speak up. > > > > Look .... This should have all stopped with Brad's apology. We all know > > that at one time or another we have probably said something that was out of > > line. Brad, I did not like what you said. But I accepted your apology > > believing that it was sincere and that was it. In the future let's let our > > little slipups be dropped with a timely and sincere apology and be done with > > it. > > > > Brad, Anthony, Bob and all the others that are still beating up this dead > > horse. WE DON'T CARE. Take it offline, call each other, send telegrams or > > carrier pigeons, whatever. But please leave all this clutter off the PDML. > > We are all about photography and Pentax, not personal issues that cause > > dissention and only serve the needs of those who are indulging themselves. > > I, unlike some others read, almost every email so as not to miss some tidbit > > of valuable information that might help make me a better photographer or > > more knowledgeable about Pentax equipment. We shouldn't have to take our > > valuable time to build filters and sort through email. Please just drop this > > thread and let's get on with discussing photography. > > > > I have really enjoyed the PDML having just got back into it again after a > > short hiatus and find it valuable to a budding semi-pro like myself. My > > questions are answered thoughtfully and politely and my opinions are valued. > > This is how things should be in my humble opinion. > > > > Glen O'Neal
