Don't interupt, this is the most
intelectual disscusion I've ever had on
PDML :)

Feroze
----- Original Message -----
From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)


> Something tells me some of ya'll are putting waaaaaay too much thought
into
> this ... :) It's merely a Deep-South expression about someone's intellect,
> which just might be pushing maximum density, put in a very coloful manner.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:09 AM
> Subject: OT: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
>
>
> > So 'stupid' is a substance - less dense than water and insoluble. But
> creeks
> > flow. At least all those I've seen do - most of the time. All the
'stupid'
> > would be washed downstream. I don't find this one funny at all.
> >
> > Still thick as two planks.
> >
> > Aaaaargh!
> >
> > Dr E D F Williams
> >
> > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> > Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> > Updated: March 30, 2002
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
> >
> >
> > > The way I read it was that the person was so stupid
> > > that it(stupidity) dissolved in water and floated to the surface,
> > > which could be skimmed off the top for a period of 3 weeks.
> > > Now all the "funny" is gone since you made me think about it,
> > > thanks a lot buddies
> > >
> > > Feroze
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Rob,
> > > >
> > > > You are not alone. I didn't understand it either. Perhaps there's a
> > typing
> > > > error? Is stupid a substance? In any case 'throw'em' translates (for
> me
> > at
> > > > least) to 'throw them'.
> > > >
> > > > But I am also thick as two planks!
> > > >
> > > > Don
> > > >
> > > > Dr E D F Williams
> > > >
> > > > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> > > > Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> > > > Updated: March 30, 2002
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:55 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 25 Oct 2002 at 11:36, Feroze Kistan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That is one of the funniest I have ever heard
> > > > > > feroze
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > Treena Harp wrote in part.....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And, here's one of my dear, departed dad's: He/She's so
stupid,
> > you
> > > > could
> > > > > > > throw'em in the creek (prounced crik) and skim stupid for
three
> > > weeks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I must be thick as two short planks 'cause I don't get it :-(
> > > > >
> > > > > Rob Studdert
> > > > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> > > > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> > > > > UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to