i used photoshop quality 12 which is the best possible for jpeg. I can go back and re-scan /re-touch if needed but I dont think its warranted. I just printed the jpg @ 11 X 17 and it still looks great. JCO
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:ryan@;hack.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Atlantic Sunrise w/ the 1000mm F8 UPDATE > > > Did you happen to also save it in a lossless format? > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > >Thanks for the input. Second question is > >would inkjet prints be acceptable from > >the Epson 1280 or are they not archival > >enuff for this type of application. > > > >If inkjet prints are out, are there any > >photolabs that can make optical prints > >from the digital file? It's a 7.1 Mb > >jpeg. I want the jpeg rather than the > >original neg because I got the density > >just right and did a lot of spotting > >to clean it up. > >JCO > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Herb Chong [mailto:HerbChong@;compuserve.com] > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:58 PM > >>To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: RE: Atlantic Sunrise w/ the 1000mm F8 UPDATE > >> > >> > >>unmounted 11x17 should be fairly expensive. don't settle for > less than at > >>least $60USD and more like $80USD for the bare print unless he > is going to > >>buy more. > >> > >>Herb.... > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
