I have no idea! I personally don't think VC skin tones are particularly accurate in general. I would think the UC might be a good vacation film, but I can't see using it for portraits. Then again, I haven't tried it....
tv > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:bkdayton@;rcsis.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:08 PM > To: tom > Subject: Re[2]: New Kodak print film > > > Tom, > > Even if you assume the VC skin tones are accurate, why would you > oversaturate the skin tones? I can see possibly oversaturating the > scenery. > > > Bruce > > > > Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 12:02:42 PM, you wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dick graham [mailto:Dick.Graham@;ndscs.nodak.edu] > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 1:55 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: New Kodak print film > >> > >> > >> The latest issue of Pop Photo has a little discription of > >> the new Portra > >> 400UC. In it Kodak claims that while it has increased > >> color saturation > >> over VC skin tones remain true. > > t> I guess if you think VC skin tones are accurate that's > great news. > > t> tv >
