Maybe it is just relabeled Gold Max 400. :)
Bruce Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 12:40:33 PM, you wrote: t> I have no idea! t> I personally don't think VC skin tones are particularly accurate in t> general. I would think the UC might be a good vacation film, but I t> can't see using it for portraits. Then again, I haven't tried it.... t> tv >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:bkdayton@;rcsis.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:08 PM >> To: tom >> Subject: Re[2]: New Kodak print film >> >> >> Tom, >> >> Even if you assume the VC skin tones are accurate, why would you >> oversaturate the skin tones? I can see possibly oversaturating the >> scenery. >> >> >> Bruce >> >> >> >> Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 12:02:42 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: dick graham [mailto:Dick.Graham@;ndscs.nodak.edu] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 1:55 PM >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Subject: Re: New Kodak print film >> >> >> >> >> >> The latest issue of Pop Photo has a little discription of >> >> the new Portra >> >> 400UC. In it Kodak claims that while it has increased >> >> color saturation >> >> over VC skin tones remain true. >> >> t> I guess if you think VC skin tones are accurate that's >> great news. >> >> t> tv >>
