Stupid OE. Hey Vic,
Well, proven wrong is interesting. Whether I am or not doesn't bother me. I like what I have, it serves. I am interested in this LX love affair. I can see pictures on the web and such, but until I meet someone that has one that isn't beat to pieces, and can see a demonstration and maybe try it for myself, I will think MZ-S is just plain better. I would really like to meet the LX ;-) Will the MZ-S have such a following? You never know, but in 20 years will 35mm film still be available? If it's not, the MZ-S will never have a chance to prove its self like the LX (apparently) has. So, anyone wanna drop by my place and show me what I'm missing? Semi-serious here. Everyone puts this body on a pedestal, and I'd like to see why. Maybe in time I shall meet up with the TO PDMLers and one of them will have it. I like what I see in pictures, but as you all know, that really isn't enough. In the meantime I will keep my eye open on the used equipment in the city and, I think you'll all say doubtfully, find an LX and see what's what. Regards, Brad Dobo ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:11 AM Subject: Re: MZ-S vs Z-1p > > In a message dated 10/31/02 3:44:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << Will I get stoned to > > death if I say the MZ-S is better than the LX? >> > > No you won't get stoned, just proven wrong. They are completely different > cameras, but I ask: Will the MZS have the cult following of the LX 20 years > from now. I don't think so. It's a very nice camera, a good tool. But it's > not one you'll fall in love with and want to keep forever. It's also not, > what I would call a system camera like the LX was. Of course, the LX is not a > camera for everyone either... > Vic >
