On 6 Nov 2002 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anton, if it were me I wouldn't care one bit. I have never used 3200, can't > imagine anyone ever using 3200 and see no point in ever using 3200. You may have > a very special application for it but I doubt it. I often shoot very long > exposures without any problems on my LX. I would much rather go for a longer > exposure than shoot film at 3200. The grain must be brutal... Vic
This is a prime example of how diverse a crowd we are :-) I most often have my LX loaded with D3200 or TMZ and shoot at ISO 3200 and it's frustrating that the ISO is so limited since at ISO3200 no over-exposure compensation is available. This is one reason that I really used to like my old Contax RTS II for use with fast film, it had an ISO 6400 position and two stops of compensation available so that I could compensate or simply add adjustment for when I was shooting at ISO12800 :-) There are many many instances where tripods and long exposures just aren't practical: http://pug.komkon.org/01may/acoustics.html Grain wasn't too bad either. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
