I cannot believe such bad luck.  I can easily see why you'd give up on them.
Now I'm afraid to inspect my lenses that closely and worried about the new
FA 20-35mm f/4 AL that is on it's way.  Pardon my french Alan but I'd go and
tear a Pentax a new a*****e over this.  FA*......bad

Brad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:28 AM
Subject: Re: FA*200/2.8 matter again...


> Hi Rob,
>
> There is some dust inside this 200mm, so to the 1st one I returned.
However,
> what concerns me is the scratches present behind the 1st element (on 2nd
or
> 3rd I think). There are many of them in all different directions actually,
> not circular. It definitely looks like cleaned by hand. When the light was
> pointed from different angle, cleaning marks were revealed too (but
totally
> invisible if if the light was point directly). This is my only brand new
> lens with so many scratches and cleaning marks. My 2ndhand F*300/4.5 has
> cleaning marks too, but not scratch. My brand new FA100/2.8 has 1 hairline
> scratch inside, but this 200 has a lot. All my other Pentax lenses are
fine
> even after years of use. Since this is the 4th lens that I have tried
> recently (and all 4 are faulty), I think I am ready to give up and ask for
a
> full refund. I have known there are qc problem with Pentax products for
> years, but I have never expected to be so unlucky. Looks like I won't be
> buying any Pentax lenses in the near future.  :(
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> >I shone a halide desk-lamp through mine both ways, I'm now a little blind
I
> >think however I did spy with my working eye heaps of dust boulders and
one
> >small hair (which looked like a fungus filament but wasn't). However when
I
> >view it under normal light it looks fine (and so do the images that it
> >makes on
> >film).
> >
> >I don't believe that many photo enthusiast spec lenses are delivered
> >completely
> >free from dust even factory fresh (my new APO Leica lenses weren't)
however
> >finger prints and wipe marks shouldn't be tolerated.
> >
> >Are all your other lenses much cleaner than this 200?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Rob Studdert
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>

Reply via email to