And you use KA adaptall with your manual bodies?I prefer tamron 2.8 since it gives
1:1.What about quality of the lens?
Alek
I am leaving and answer within a few days.
Thanks
Użytkownik Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM
>Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
>
>
>> I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc
>and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy
>adaptall for my cameras and wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is
>good for PZ-1 it also should work with newer bodies I hope.
>> Manual lenses are really great, that is why I bought manual macro one.
>> Alek
>
>I own the original Tamron SP 90/2.5. It has been a great lens for the past
>20 years.
>My other Tamron lens is the SP 70-210/3.5-4. Not too shabby.
>Both work well with my Super Program and Ricoh XR-X.
>
>Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with
>the AF Pentax models.
>
>Jeff.
>
