Hi Vic, Yep, been there done that. I have just sold a 19-35mm Tokina F/3.5-4.5. It was a solid little performer, however there was a little bit too much light fall-off in the corners. I am looking for a little bit more performance, and am prepared to pay for it. At this stage, I think I will go for the FA* 24mm, as everyone raves about it.
Cheers Shaun Canning Archaeology Department La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia. Ph: 0414-967 644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Pentxuser@;aol.com] Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 03:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wideangle Dilemmas Shaun a cheaper alternative might be to look for the older Tokina 20-35/3.5??? it's an excellent lens and could be picked up much cheaper than the f2.8. It takes a 77mm filter ring as well.. Vic In a message dated 11/13/02 4:32:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Shaun, I believe that if the filter system is a critical factor in your choice, then you are picking the Tokina. The FA *24 hood will not fit a 77mm filter. I just tried it - no go. Having used both the FA *24 and the Tokina, the Pentax is one sweet lens. The Tokina is no slouch either, but flare control is not nearly as good. Do be cautious with polarizing at 24mm or wider. You might end up with some banding in the sky. >>
