Vic, I think everyone is pretty sensible on this. They both appear to all of us from all our various sources and experiences and whatever, to be really very much the same. If you're a fixed guy, you know the one you want, or if you want low light, the same. If you want wider and have some room to move, you've got the other. The pics are gonna be the same for all/most intents and purposes.
Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: Re: SMCP FA 20-35mm f/4 AL or the FA* 24mm f/2 AL WAS -- Re: Wideangle Dilemmas > > In a message dated 11/14/02 8:03:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << But to the core of the matter. Which is better? The SMCP FA 20-35mm f/4 > AL > > or the FA* 24mm f/2 AL? I know the general opinion, and I just won't > > comment. Except that any difference in image quality is small, very. >> > > I agree. I would go for the 20-35mm myself and try to pick up a K24/2.8. > Although I love primes, I tend to use zooms more often... The difference in > quality really does not matter for most of us... (Oh boy I can't wait to see > the responses on this one.) > Vic > >
