But wrong. Sorry guys. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:22 AM Subject: RE: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105
> Good point. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 21 November 2002 16:16 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105 > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Rob Brigham > > Subject: RE: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105 > > > > > > > > > I think it may stem from another definition of prime. That of > > primary. > > > > If you read several definitions of the word prime, the common > > denominator is "one", or "singular". As in one focal length, > > or single focal length. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > >
