Sorry, none convenient for you. There's a shop that manufactures metal parts for many purposes just beside where I work (Oslo). I talked to them once about it, but haven't got around to give them the actual specs yet.
Jostein ----- Original Message ----- From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 6:13 PM Subject: RE: 645 300mm A vs FA > Do you know of any suppliers? > > -- > Thomas Van Veen Photography > www.bigdayphoto.com > 301-758-3085 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:36 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 645 300mm A vs FA > > > > > > Tom, > > That's the major weakness with the A* lens, IMO. > > However, there's plenty of room to attach a 3rd party or custom made > > collar without affecting any controls. I have been thinking about > > doing that with mine. > > Jostein > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:02 PM > > Subject: RE: 645 300mm A vs FA > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have experience with these lenses? Moslty I'm > > > > wondering if > > > > there any optical differences. They're both ED (IF), so I'm > > thinking > > > > the FA just has AF. > > > > > > > > OTOH, the A seems to go for 1/2 of what the FA goes for > > > > used, so maybe > > > > there *is* some big optical difference. > > > > > > Ah. One big difference is the A doesn't have a tripod collar. > > > > > > Dang. > > > > > > tv > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
