Paul Stenquist wrote: > > No need for apologies. Your point was a valid one, and a clarification > was in order. But you're right, we should let this go. I've probably > been most guilty of prolonging it, and I apologize for doing so.
Uh huh, now that we've got _that_ out of the way... > I had a great shoot this morning with a new model. She's a bubbly 30 > year old who could easily pass for 20. But most importantly, she was > full of life and really into role playing. I shot three rolls of Ilford > 3200 in my 6x7 with window light and three rolls of Portra 400 with a > flash firing into a reflector. I set up another big reflector to bounce > back some of the window light. Hope to get some nice prints. > Paul And, you're going to post them, right? keith = rest snipped =
