I feel that we aren't paying anything extra for the features that we may not use. We are paying for the features that we must have. The PZ-1p has as many features as many higher priced cameras but is more economically priced, as is the MZ-S.
Pentax didn't make a PZ-1p or an MZ-S in models with less or more features that you can choose, so why do you feel that you are paying extra for the features that you don't use? Just consider these features as being at no extra cost and either use them or not as you desire. Some time in the future you may actually find a need for a specific feature that you have never used before and you'll be happy it is available. Len --- > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 12:55 PM > To: Chris Brogden > Subject: Re[4]: Why I won't be buying an MZ-S > > > Hi, > > > If you just want to use one and not > > the other, then leave your camera set up to use your > preferred method > > all the time and you won't be confused. > > the question that then arises is, why should the customer pay > for a lot of functions that they'll never use, and for all > the additional complexity that has to go into making all the > duplicated functionality work together? For any given > customer, if each control is duplicated the customer has > twice as many controls as they need, and the increase in > complexity is not linear. Why should they have to pay for that? > > --- > > Bob > >
