----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Scott Subject: Re: A 100/2.8 Macro on eBay
> Photodo's rating confuses me, because it rates the F 100/2.8 so much > higher than the FA 100/2.8. Both of them are the same optically from > all accounts. Perhaps one of Photodo's samples was defective? If yes, > then which? For myself, I think Photodo is defective. See: http://svt.se/hogafflahage/hogafflaHage_site/Kor/hestekor.swf William Robb
