I'm sorry to hear that this thing has turned sour. It was very
thoughtful on your part, and I share your displeasure in learning that
someone on the list provoked Tom. I'm also somewhat dismayed that Tom
would complain without first inquiring.
Paul

frank theriault wrote:
> 
> Excuse me for venting, but I'm going to anyway.
> 
> Got an e-mail from Graywolf today, asking what's up with money that I
> was collecting on his behalf from list members.  It seems that someone
> (a list member, but I don't know who) told him that I've "dropped off
> the list", and since Tom hadn't heard from me in a week or two (I've
> been waiting for enough money to come in to make it worth sending Tom a
> cheque), he was getting worried.
> 
> In fact, we've collected over $600, and a first cheque will be ready to
> go by Friday for about $400 (the balance, being personal cheques from
> the US, will take 25 days to clear my account).
> 
> I'm just wondering who would have told Tom that?  Geez, I usually post
> at least once or more per day (I know it's usually drivel, but it's
> there!).  Whoever it is, do you think you could have contacted me,
> before telling Tom that I've dropped out of sight?  This really leaves a
> bad taste in my mouth - poor Tom was needlessly worried that everyone on
> the list, along with him might be in the process of being scammed (to
> use a word that he did).  I'm really pissed off!!
> 
> If the person who spread this malicious rumour reads this, I'd ~really~
> like you to contact me off list with an explanation of your actions.
> Beware, I might have a few choice words for you!
> 
> -frank
> 
> --
> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
> pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
> Oppenheimer

Reply via email to