I think that Tom was just inquiring. I hadn't been in contact with him for a couple of weeks, and he wanted to know what's up. I bear him no ill will.
It was his indication that he had information that I'd "dropped off the list" that angered me. He obviously got it from someone, because if he'd checked the archives, he's see my frequent posts. I'm just curious as to who that someone is, and why they would pass something like that to Tom. I'm sure that Tom was quite dismayed to hear that information, so I can't blame him for his inquiry. I really don't feel that anything regarding the effort in and of itself has gone sour. We've gathered a good deal of money, and Tom will soon be getting it. That's the important thing. Of course, maybe I'm just being overly sensitive, and shouldn't worry about it. There may be an innocent explanation; I'm all ears! <vbg> thanks, Paul, frank Paul Stenquist wrote: > I'm sorry to hear that this thing has turned sour. It was very > thoughtful on your part, and I share your displeasure in learning that > someone on the list provoked Tom. I'm also somewhat dismayed that Tom > would complain without first inquiring. > Paul > > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
