Any idea on when this is going to make it into a final release?
--
Jordan Tardif
DreamHost
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, REIBENSCHUH Alfred wrote:
this is a bug in powerdns tcp implementation, i posted a patch for this a
few days ago
--
Alfred Reibenschuh
INFORMATIONS-TECHNOLOGIE AUSTRIA GMBH
Netzwerk-Management
A-1020 Wien, Lassallestrasse 5
T: ++43-1-21717-58947
F: ++43-1-21717-58979
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.it-austria.com <http://www.it-austria.com>
Diese Nachricht und allf?llige angeh?ngte Dokumente sind vertraulich und nur
f?r den/die Adressaten bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der beabsichtigte
Adressat sein, ist jede Offenlegung, Weiterleitung oder sonstige Verwendung
dieser Information nicht gestattet. In diesem Fall bitten wir, den Absender
zu verst?ndigen und die Information zu vernichten. F?r ?bermittlungsfehler
oder sonstige Irrt?mer bei ?bermittlung besteht keine Haftung.
This message and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the addressee(s). Any publication, transmission or other use of the
information by a person or entity other than the intended addressee is
prohibited. If you receive this in error please contact the sender and
delete the material. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions as a result of the transmission.
-----Original Message-----
From: Augie Schwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pdns-users] TCP Queries always go to the recursor?
Is there a reason why TCP queries are always getting sent to the
recursor (if available) for answers instead of checking for an
authoritative answer first and then recursing if no authoritative
answer was found?
I am able to reproduce this by setting up a bogus zone in our
authoritative data (MySQL) and watching as I get the correct answer
for UDP recurse and norecurse queries as well as TCP norecurse
queries, however I see root referrals for TCP recurse queries. An even
easier way to see this is to ask for the version.bind :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig +short ch txt version.bind @pdns-lab
+notcp +norecurse
"Served by POWERDNS 2.9.21-svn.20061029.908 $Id: packethandler.cc 884
2006-08-19 12:32:32Z ahu $"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig +short ch txt version.bind @pdns-lab
+notcp +recurse
"Served by POWERDNS 2.9.21-svn.20061029.908 $Id: packethandler.cc 884
2006-08-19 12:32:32Z ahu $"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig +short ch txt version.bind @pdns-lab
+tcp +norecurse
"Served by POWERDNS 2.9.21-svn.20061029.908 $Id: packethandler.cc 884
2006-08-19 12:32:32Z ahu $"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig +short ch txt version.bind @pdns-lab
+tcp +recurse
"PowerDNS Recursor 3.1.4-pre2 $Id: pdns_recursor.cc 903 2006-10-21
16:26:49Z ahu $"
I am going to go check the RFC, but does anyone know why this would be
the case? This is with both PowerDNS recursor and BIND as a recursor.
--
Augie Schwer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://schwer.us
Key fingerprint = 9815 AE19 AFD1 1FE7 5DEE 2AC3 CB99 2784 27B0 C072
_______________________________________________
Pdns-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
_______________________________________________
Pdns-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
