what about a community donation? we could create a ticket with all people interested in this feature and how much can they contribute.
i think there's more people than we thing using LDAP backend. ----- Missatge original ----- > On 23/3/2011 11:05 πμ, bert hubert wrote: > > > Unless something happens, the LDAP backend will move to > > 'unmaintained' status in the 3.0 release. > I think this attitude is the best. At least new admins planning DNS > server deployment *will know* that they should probably keep off LDAP > backend, since it's unmaintained. > > My opinion is that LDAP backend is a very good solution for (at least) > small-to-mid sized organizations which can store/manage/use in a DIT > all their data and use standard admin tools, and this backend should > be maintained, but you are right: Since no direct interest is > expressed (which I still find surprising), there is no other way to > go. > > Pitty I am not a (professional) developer and my organization doesn't > have the resources to invest in improving an already good (as I think) > piece of software. We'll have to live with the current version and > probably migrate to other backend later - unless things change. Maybe > some people/organization will continue to find LDAP backend cool > enough to give it a push. :-) > > Thanks, > Nick > > _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing > list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
